inquiry

Can't help but laugh this morning.

And laugh. And laugh. And laugh.

Why?

That the local variable also known as the-idea-of-me could ever imagine affecting anything outside the scope in which it's defined.

Including its own metadata....

Enlightenment isn't something a local variable – aka self/person/individual – can attain unto. Rather, it's an im-mediate (i.e. not mediated by defining local scope phenomena) letting go of local scope altogether, i.e. realizing said local scope is but a transient dream to begin with.

Essentially: one stack pop and, “Poof! It (i.e. defining local scope) was gawwwwwwwn!”.

The local variable is “in the world”, aka its defining local scope.

But This (see also: “I Am That I Am”) which seemingly gives rise unto defining local scopes obviously couldn't be “of the world”, i.e. of any such defining local scope.

Let it – i.e. the local variable (aka “you”) mostly flailing against its defining local scope (aka the world) – GO GO GO!

> I should write an e-book about this. Maybe?

And increase the overall amount of 'e' people are already drowning in? ;–)

> I notice that I essentially visit the same three Websites > all the time on the Internet

'Tis definitely a realm in which less is more.