It's nine o'clock on a Saturday (sure.. am.. but still...)
Pour some write.asoline on that puppy! ;–)
(FWIW, the mere mention of fire has me remembering this rather excellent version of The Ohio Players performing their “Fire” live...)
> How can you expand the reach of your fire, passion, and > energy in your life?
Hmmm. If anything, I'm looking the opposite direction, less being consumed after seemingly shaken in searing hot jaws.
LOL... I almost always “scrape” read.write.as, so it's all 24x7 terminal font to me.
To me, the whole “how cool can we make things look in browsers?” thing has been mostly evidence of shallowness. I understand such things make some kinds of differences in some ways, but I'd much rather the same effort poured into the writing itself than the trappings/packaging.
It kind of reminds me about how people whine about “materialism” during holiday seasons, but then go buy their friends, family, and kids gobs of gifts, thereby making most if not all of the season about materialism.
I mean, please... spare me the goddamned dufuckingplicity....
So... do people want solid online content, or do they want a pretty bleeping picture show? Seems to me they say the former, but their actions keep belying far more cherishing the latter.
Tough quandary.
I think it's mostly getting over the myth of journalism, i.e. that it's some noble thing well above and beyond profiteering.
It may be important to remember no non-free-willed-entity thing “is” anything in particularly but what the wielder(s) thereof is(are). So if “journalism” is a disgusting thing, it's for being primarily created by disgusting people. There's just no way around that, for “journalism” isn't some independent being doing things – it's a sort of emergent chimera that we speak of as though it were a being of sorts.. like with sports teams, where we say “the <the name of any sports team> did so and so”. Well, no... there really is no such <the name of any sports team> being: just a bunch of people doing things under the guise of a corporate individual, and lots of deluded people believing in the mythical being.
> Making meaningful, community-based, small (and then larger) > changes OURSELVES
Add the word 'in' before the word 'OURSELVES', and I'm on board....
Mmmm!
Behaving like oppressors (“fight back non-violently”) merely perpetuates oppression – especially in subtle ways.
The only hope is that enough people being better people than the oppressors somehow convinces the oppressors to become better people such that the oppression fades like the people in Marty's photograph in “Back to the Future”.
> And so, we must never give up this fight!
In fact, giving up “fight” is on possible first step toward a world in which there is no fight....
Whatever system is well nigh irrelevant: good people can make a shitty system work, and lousy people can wreck the best system.
I think it best to stop pretending “systems” are as though beings such that they can do anything.
Change occurs when enough individuals change such that their collective behavior(s) sum to a different – and hopefully more positive – value. The ongoing whine – at the social discourse level – about changing systems is really just so much procrastination from what each individual needs to get busy at hard work with.
Oh, but it will. I'm salivating even as I type!